Monday, February 06, 2012

Tamron 17-50 2.8 Lens Review

Its funny how I never got around to talking about this lens. It was the first lens I got along with the 70-200 2.8. 

Comments

1. Samuel+H said...

I love mine too, great lens for a very reasonable price

but beware: the VC version is absolutely horrible
it's not just that it's more expensive, so if you're not going to use that feature it's better to save a bit of money: it's a completely different optical formula, and it's really really really soft
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=679&Camera=474&Sample=0&FLI=1&API=0&LensComp=400&CameraComp=474&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=1&APIComp=0

it's featured on Lensrental's list of Stuff I Wish I'd Never Bought:
http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/01/stuff-i-wish-id-never-bought

some people shoot happily with the VC version, but I know I wouldn't

2. Steve+Oakley said...

thanks for the added info. sometimes simpler is better !

Commenting has been turned off for this entry.